liberation4CA Escribio:
Apr 11, 2008 - Hyperbolating "victims" such as yourself cry about the UN legitimacy, yet are against enforcing that legitimacy thru force if needed, thereby de-legitimizing the UN. The UN, by the way, as revealed from documents seized during the war, is, in terms of scale, the most corrupt organization in modern history, so in retrospect,they have no legitimacy whatsoever. And your presumptive and premature assumption that the war was all for nothing is short-sighted, just like all the useless whiny libs.
shawnclarke Escribio:
Apr 11, 2008 - typical bullshit, man the only way those Al Quida pussies know how to fight is by road side bombs cause they cant man up, i hate these videos because those fuckin pussies cant fight, theyre cowards and blow themselves up becuase they can face consequence, FUCKIN PUSSIES
citizenom Escribio:
Apr 11, 2008 - go crawl back inside your moms ass...when its time for your rebirth, you will hear the flush
liberation4CA Escribio:
Apr 11, 2008 - LOL. Great counter-argument there citizenom. Proving my point about the Leftists and their Muslim butt-buddies once again. You're a great asset to your cause. Did you actually graduate from any kind of high school?
apha87 Escribio:
Apr 12, 2008 - fuck you, I'm coming after you now. i will be at ur place in a hr. i will shoot u in head.
Donten43 Escribio:
Apr 12, 2008 - Liberation4: What are your thoughts on WMD's, and claims that Saddam was in league with Alqeda. Two critical points in the argument to go to war in the first place, and both of which have since been proven to be fabricated by the US? Also, In yor opinion, what are the objectives of this conflict?
Donten43 Escribio:
Apr 12, 2008 - Libbo: Were the 20 years of "UN" resolutions against Iraq made by the "legitiment" UN or the "far from legitiment", "most corrupt organization in history", UN? Or is there a difference relitive to whats being debated, by who, and at what time?
101airbourn Escribio:
Apr 12, 2008 - BOOM... now it's time to die a fine Islamic death. Of course the dead cunts should be grateful. Not as fine a death as getting hit by a Boeing 767 while on the 97th floor of a tall ass building, but i'm sure you duppy cunts get the picture...Anyway must dash... pilot training !
aloshi4you Escribio:
Apr 12, 2008 - apha87, come come redneck , make sure you said goodbye to your mom and dad.
liberation4CA Escribio:
Apr 12, 2008 - OK, Donten, to answer some of your curiousity. as far as the UN is concerned. Many of us believed, and still do, that the UN at best is ineffectual, at worst corrupt to the core. The extent of the corruption was underestimated till after the war, when Oil-for-Food docs were seized. Billions in payouts and kickbacks, and little food to the ones who deserved it. This, among others, in retrospect rendered the UN completely farcical in the eyes of many.
liberation4CA Escribio:
Apr 12, 2008 - BEFORE the war, the US tried very hard to honor the validity of the UN, and in fact did so in it's ouster of Saddam, based on many resolutions adopted by the UN. It was the Security Council, and it's various members (China, Russia) with alterior motives that tried to hold up actions against Saddam that the UN had repeatedly called for over the years. Turns out that docs from after the war showed that billions in business,mainly arms and oil, existed between China, Russia Iraq.
liberation4CA Escribio:
Apr 12, 2008 - SO in retrospect, the legitimacy of the UN before the war, though tenious, was honored until we realized that they were unwilling to enforse their own resolutions, so we had no problem doing it for them, and without them. AFTER the war, we fully discovered that the UN was a corrupt, ineffectual joke, so our action in Iraq, though called for in many UN resolutions, really had no reason to seek any approval from such a worthless body.
liberation4CA Escribio:
Apr 12, 2008 - Now as far as our reasons to take out Saddam, in a basic sense, leaving a rogue and illegal regime (even in the UN's eyes) with prior use of WMD's, in the middle of region that festered all the terrorism against the West, would be like leaving a hardware store in the middle of a town full of carpenters. AS we found later, the UN did nothing but make Saddam stronger every year, so NOTHING would have been done to deal with him. In the post 9/11 era, taking him out was obvious.
liberation4CA Escribio:
Apr 12, 2008 - Now to say the WMD and AlQueda connection was "fabricated" is an extremely simplistic and inaccurate statement, fed to you by biased and simple-minded partisans. Saddam himself, after capture, admitted he repeatedly violated UN and US sanctions regarding that. He admitted himself that he led the entire world to believe he still had WMD's to stave off attacks from us and Iran. Hindsight is 20/20, so IF he didn't really have any before we hit him, he played a dangerous game with us, and lost.
liberation4CA Escribio:
Apr 12, 2008 - Now to say the WMD and AlQueda connection was "fabricated" is an extremely simplistic and inaccurate statement, fed to you by biased and simple-minded partisans. Saddam himself, after capture, admitted he repeatedly violated UN and US sanctions regarding that. He admitted himself that he led the entire world to believe he still had WMD's to stave off attacks from us and Iran. Hindsight is 20/20, so IF he didn't really have any before we hit him, he played a dangerous game with us, and lost.
liberation4CA Escribio:
Apr 12, 2008 - Now for many of us, we suspected that the WMD thing was not a REAL reason to get Saddam, just something to feed the hysterical anti-war simpletons. The real reasons to most of us was what I talked about earlier. He was in a state of war with us, if he didn't have WMD's then, he planned on reaquiring them (his own admission) and for the West to gain a foothold in the MidEast and to deal with the islamo-nutjobs, countries like Iraq and Iran (as well as Afgan) had to be dealt with definitively.
liberation4CA Escribio:
Apr 12, 2008 - Personally, my only complaint is that we didn't hit Iran first, or by now, because they, too, need to be dealt with. It's just that Saddam had the history, resolutions, and threats that justified taking him out first. There is also a significant internal movement against the mullahs in Iran, so there is hope that revolution there will be the solution. Otherwise, for us, Iran will follow soon, and it's about time too.
7m789r Escribio:
Apr 12, 2008 - and we are coming too.little american bitch you fucking rape ass
35michal35 Escribio:
Apr 12, 2008 - With bottle with benzin? he he he don't be moron
ewiz07 Escribio:
Apr 12, 2008 - SUPPORT U.S. TROOPS AND U.S. MILITARY THERE IS NO allahh
eckman69 Escribio:
Apr 12, 2008 - haha, your insane utter nonsense makes me laugh. Now get your potato gun and join the fun billie boy
Donten43 Escribio:
Apr 12, 2008 - Libbo: I can see you are a true believer in the cause. While this is to be admired, I'm still not conviced war, and death of 100,000's on inocents was justified. You seriouly tell me that the US was afraid of Iraq, a tiny country on the opposite side of the world, that had nothing to do with 9/11, and with a decimated military (post Kuwait) was a threat to MidEast stability! By "rogue and illegal" do you refer to Saddams turn from the US$ for pricing oil, in favour of the Euro?
Gondorcon Escribio:
Apr 12, 2008 - well but god s stll real
mottnianhunter Escribio:
Apr 12, 2008 - 13 قتلت رجل مسلّح كان في بغداد في يوم السّبت. المتأخّر كان يتنازع في بغداد شرقيّ [سدر] مدينة ضاحية, قلعة المؤيّد [موقتدا] [سدر]. في يوم الجمعة, [ريد] قتلت [أل-نوري], قريبة ومفتاح مساعد من الرجل دين, كان برجل مسلّح في المدينة [نجف].
liberation4CA Escribio:
Apr 11, 2008 - Donten, 20 years of UN resolutions calling for Saddam's removal were offset by Security Council's refusal to endorse, because of the truly corrupt and murdering regimes of Russia and China, as well as the cowardly french. However, the UN is far from a legitimate body. Legitimate is a relative term, a concept I wouldn't expect a dullwit like yourself to reconcile with his simple-minded, unidimensional logic.